Near
the end of the twentieth century, modern optimism started to morph into
postmodern cynicism. After two hundred
years of optimism based on human autonomy, the nineteenth century brought
international military conflicts of incredible proportion, nuclear bombs, an
unimaginable magnitude of bloodshed, and ideological conflicts beyond
belief. Science began to be viewed with
suspicion, and human reason was often downright rejected.
If reason based on the scientific method brought the human race to the very
brink of self-destruction, perhaps it wasn’t so trustworthy after all. The very notion of “objective” reason began
to be severely questioned. Some
postmodern thinkers denied that humans were capable of being completely
objective. Postmodernists asserted that “universal
truth” did not even exist. They saw
truth as being something determined by cultural and social contexts. This produced such statements as, “What is
true for you may not be true for me,” and allowed non-Christians to stand up to
Christians with responses like, “I’m glad you’ve found the truth that works for
you!” Truth, for the postmodern
pessimist, became a matter of personal preference. All faiths and ideologies were viewed as
equally “true.” The cry of the
postmodern era was “tolerance!” However, tolerance not only means allowing others to hold their own set of
beliefs while you hold yours; it means accepting
that everyone else’s doctrine is just as true as your own.
Postmodernism
turns to human intuition to determine truth.
However, turning to human feelings to find the truth that’s right for
you is just as problematic as trying to use the scientific method to determine
universal truth. Does believing that a
certain idea is true make it
true? Is there no objective standard of
truth by which all claims of truth can be measured? It
naturally follows that, if truth is different for everyone, so is reality. Reality itself is a human construct. Liberty is viewed as “the right to define
one’s own concept of existence, of meaning, of the universe, and of the mystery
of human life.” Carrying such reasoning
to its logical conclusion, such a definition of liberty could be used to
justify abortion, infanticide, euthanasia… what next?
Neither modernism nor postmodernism are dead. In 21st-century America, the “prevailing wind” is postmodernism. It is a climate that allows Eastern occultism and Islamism to thrive right alongside of Atheism and Christianity. This is the world in which my friends and I are growing up. This is the world in which we must be prepared to lead, the world in which we must take a stand for what we believe, and discover truth through divine revelation, through God’s Word—the only source of real, ultimate truth.
*This post is my personal thoughts on chapter 8 of Assumptions that Affect our Lives by Christian Overman, "The Prevailing Wind of Postmodernism."
Neither modernism nor postmodernism are dead. In 21st-century America, the “prevailing wind” is postmodernism. It is a climate that allows Eastern occultism and Islamism to thrive right alongside of Atheism and Christianity. This is the world in which my friends and I are growing up. This is the world in which we must be prepared to lead, the world in which we must take a stand for what we believe, and discover truth through divine revelation, through God’s Word—the only source of real, ultimate truth.
*This post is my personal thoughts on chapter 8 of Assumptions that Affect our Lives by Christian Overman, "The Prevailing Wind of Postmodernism."
No comments:
Post a Comment