FDR
had a reputation for vagueness, inconsistency, and self-contradiction, according
to historian Robert Shogan in his book Hard Bargain (p.27), but he “cloaked his guile with a personal charm.” By 1940 a troublesome pattern was well
established: FDR tailored his stances on foreign policy to suit his immediate
political interest and said whatever his particular audience wanted to hear (Shogan, p.33-34), Often, though FDR maintained that “ideals do
not change but methods [of attaining them] do change,” his words were chosen
not to uphold ideals but to attain power; once he was in power it became
incredibly difficult to see the connection between his methods and the
international ideals that he apparently still upheld (Shogan, p.40-41). In hindsight, it is clear that the ideals FDR
professed were not the same as the ones towards which he actually strove.
The 1937 Neutrality Act did not last
long. In late 1940, under pressure from
British Prime Minister Winston Churchill during the Battle of Britain, FDR
began to formulate plans to side with Britain in an underhanded way. The Blitz ended in October of 1940; in
December FDR announced his intention to begin sending money and supplies to the
governments of Britain, China, and later the U.S.S.R. He pushed the Lend-Lease Act through
Congress, which allowed Britain to “borrow” billions of dollars’ worth of
American supplies without paying for them.
Lend-Lease voided the Neutrality Act’s requirement for cash payments,
although the ban on the travel of U.S. armed ships abroad remained in place (Shogan, p.264). FDR simplified the appearance of his scheme
by using the analogy of lending one’s garden hose to a neighbor to put out a
fire, then rather than requiring payment for the hose, simply requesting that it
be returned once the fire has been quenched.
FDR’s Illegal Secret Agreement with
Churchill
Atlantic Charter Conference |
The author does not claim the rights to any of the images in this post.
No comments:
Post a Comment